There has been increased
discussion in the halls of our capitol about the impact tax exemptions have on
our state. Previously, I
talked in detail about just how much exemptions are costing our state and how
many we have on the books. Many have
argued that it’s time to close some of those exemptions, or at least bring them
under review. Unfortunately, closing an
exemption is more complicated that you might think.
The authority to levy a tax is
clearly given in Article
VII of Washington’s Constitution, which is aptly named Revenue and Taxation. The complexities of this article and the
authority given have been the subject of numerous debates and countless courts
cases. The debates have played out in
the legislature, the Supreme Court, and the ballot. To say that it is complicated is, well, an
understatement. However, its relevance
is paramount in trying to understand just how to address the issue of
exemptions.
To put it plainly, the Federal Government
and the Washington State Legislature have the authority to manage our tax
system, including modifying any existing exemptions.
However, a recent ballot
initiative has impacted the legislature’s ability to manage Washington’s
revenue system. Initiative
1053 (led by initiative activist Tim Eyman) passed in November 2010 with
over 63% voter approval. This initiative
re-instated a 2/3rds vote requirement in both houses of the Washington State
Legislature to make any changes to our tax code. This requirement was first introduced by I-601
in 1993 and was later reinstated by I-695
in 1999 and again by I-960
in 2007. The 2/3rds requirement INCLUDES
the closure of tax exemptions because it would require legislative action that
would amend our tax code resulting in a net increase in revenue.
The super-majority
requirement has plagued reform advocates since it was first introduced. There have been a number of attempts to mitigate
the impact of these initiatives, including the introduction of a temporary
increase in sales tax on certain retail items to a full legal
challenge of I-1053 which is currently being reviewed by King County
Superior Court. The outcome of the legal
challenge will have a big impact on the legislature’s ability to address or
modify existing exemptions. Until then,
it’s going to take a supermajority in the legislature to close any of the 452
revenue generating tax exemptions.
BUT, there is another way. The ballot.
Both I-960 and its predecessor I-1053 reinforce the power of the ballot
by reinforcing the people’s right to petition their government. An existing exemption could be closed by a
simple majority vote of the people. However,
it’s important to realize just how difficult it can be to pass an initiative in
Washington State. To date, nearly 1,200
initiatives have been introduced and only 69 have successfully passed into law.
Bearing in mind the complications
associated with the closure of tax exemptions, reform advocates should remain
diligent in their efforts to bolster fairness in our tax code through the
elimination of some outmoded exemptions.
However, the road to closure for tax exemptions is wrought with pitfalls
and speed bumps. When trying to address
the fiscal crisis other more short term measures should be explored as
well. Those might include the
introduction of mandatory reviews and sunsets of existing exemptions or greater
scrutiny of any newly proposed or existing exemptions. These are two options that are being explored
which I will discuss in another post.
No comments:
Post a Comment