After the overwhelming passage of
Initiative 69
in 1932, income tax proponents were celebrating their victory and state
officials were taking steps to start collecting the recently passed graduated
income tax. As tax forms were being
printed and prepared for delivery to the public, two Seattle businessmen
brought forth a case that challenged the income tax on grounds of its lack of
uniformity. As written, Initiative 69
introduced an income tax that had higher rates for higher income earners.
William M. Culliton, an insurance
broker, and Earl McHale, owner of a chain of gas stations, with the support of
other Seattle business owners and prominent attorneys, filed their suit in
Thurston County Superior Court. This challenge was based on the uniformity
provisions of Article
VII, Section 1 of the state’s constitution.
These provisions prohibit the state from levying different rates of
taxation on the same property.
Washington had a long-standing precedent
that sought to ensure that all forms of property were taxed uniformly. This can be found in the territorial tax code
and was later incorporated into the state’s constitution. The drafters of Washington’s Constitution were
vague in their definition of property.
This was intentional and came to be understood as any taxable property,
both real and personal.
The vague nature of the
constitutional definition of property was the grounds on which the graduated income
tax portion of Initiative 69 was struck down.
The court found that income is property.
As such, a tax that introduced different tax rates on different incomes
violated the uniformity requirements of the constitution.
This decision set a precedent that
has haunted income tax efforts ever since. In the years following Cullion v. Chase, the state supreme court
has struck down 3 additional attempts at introducing an income tax in
Washington. Income tax proponents have
yet to build proposals able to pass constitutional muster because of the
court’s original decision.
The social and political
atmosphere of the 1930s was ripe for change and reform. A climate of that magnitude has yet to come over
Washington since. While there have been
many attempts to introduce an income tax in Washington, this supreme court decision
almost 80 years ago unfortunately may have laid to rest any opportunities for a
graduated income tax in Washington State.
No comments:
Post a Comment