Measuring poverty is
complicated. A 2007 Office
of Financial Management (OFM) report details the problems associated with
gauging poverty. Two common indicators
of poverty are income and social service caseloads. Measuring poverty by income is difficult because
the cost of living (healthcare, transportation, food, housing, child care etc.)
changes depending on location and family size.
Depending on the method of measurement, there are conflicting reports of
the rates of poverty in relation to income, ranging from 13% to 22% (with some
counties reaching as high as 33%). One
common thread among income measurements is that poverty in Washington is
following national
trends and is rising considerably as a result of the lingering recession.
In relation to social service
caseloads, the OFM Data
Book, a comprehensive collection of vital statistics about Washington State,
indicates that caseloads for social service programs have steadily climbed
since 2004. Over the past seven years,
there has been a 122% increase in demand for public assistance programs that
help those struggling with economic hardship.
This increase has outpaced population growth which has grown only 14%in
the past decade.
Perhaps most alarming is the
impact that poverty is having on children—one of the most vulnerable portions
of our population. The proportion of children
living in poverty is not aligned with the state wide average. 18% of Washington’s children are living in
poverty, almost a full 5% above the statewide average. This population has grown steadily since 2007
and has reached a decade-long high, with trends most likely continuing to
increase.
However, policy decisions can be
made to ensure that individuals are given opportunities to break free from the
cycle of poverty. Social service programs
and education help families and individuals move out of poverty. Unfortunately, these public programs have
been hit hard by the Great Recession.
Budget decisions, compounded by Washington’s volatile tax system, have
taken a huge bite out of the very programs and services that act as a ladder
for those continuing to struggle with economic hardship. Downward economic trends cannot be completely
avoided, but by rebuilding our tax system we can ensure greater stability and
consistency in funding for public programs.
No comments:
Post a Comment